Fort Pillow Attack :: essays papers

Fort Pillow Attack THE GRAND FABRICATION It is almost as difficult to find consistent information about the incident at Fort Pillow as it is to determine the moral significance of its outcome. Scholars disagree about exactly what transpired on April 12, 1864 at Fort Pillow, when General Nathan Bedford Forrest captured the fort with his 1,500 troops and claimed numerous Union lives in the process (Wyeth 250). It became an issue of propaganda for the Union, and as a result the facts were grossly distorted. After close examination it is clear that the  ³Fort Pillow Massacre ² (as it became known by abolitionists) was nothing of the sort. The 1,500 troops under the command of General Nathan Bedford Forrest acted as men and as soldiers in their capture of Fort Pillow. It is first necessary to understand what happened in the battle before any judgment can be made. A careful study performed by Dr. John Wyeth revealed the following information: from April 9-11, 1864, troops under the command of Ben McCulloch, Tyree Harris Bell, and Brig. General James Chalmers marched non-stop to Fort Pillow to begin their assault under the command of General Nathan Bedford Forrest. Confederate sharpshooters claimed the lives of several key Union officers during the morning assault on the fort. The losses included the commanding officer Major Loinel F. Booth, and his second in command shortly after that. These losses created a complete breakdown of order and leadership among the Union troops within the fort. (251) During the morning engagement, the gun boat the New Era was continually attempting to shell the Confederate forces from the Mississippi, but with minimal success. The Union forces fought back heartily until around one o ¹clock in the afternoon, when both sides slowed down. Around that time the New Era steamed out of range to cool its weapons. It had fired a total of 282 rounds, and its supplies were almost totally exhausted. During this hiatus in the firing, while Confederate troops waited for supplies that would arrive around three o ¹clock, Forrestwas injured when his horse fell on him after being mortaily wounded (252). When the supplies arrived, Confederate troops under a flag of truce delivered a message from Forrest that said,  ³My men have received a fresh supply of ammunition, and from their present position can easily assault and capture the fort, ² (253). Forrest demanded  ³the unconditional surrender of the garrison, ² promising

Responsibility of Employers for Acts of Employees

Another employee of your paper mill, Hotspur, steals a shipment of wood pulp for your company to impress you with initiative to secure new resources for free. Unfortunately, he runs down a pedestrian crossing properly in the crosswalk on his way back to your factory, injuring her. If the pedestrian sues your company can there be a recovery for the injury? Discuss your answer. The employee who stole the shipment will cause the company to be responsible for the recovery for the injury. I believe that this is a case of the doctrine of respondeat superior.This is Latin for â€Å"let the master respond†. The employee is an agent of the company therefore the employer is responsible for their actions. Even though the employer had no idea of knowing what the agent was going to do, the company is still liable for his/her actions. As noted in the text, the following example was given, â€Å"If a truck driver, the employee of a delivery firm, negligently runs a red light and injures a p edestrian, the owner of the truck is liable for the injury† (Hallowell & Miller, 2012).In addition, the employee could be terminated because of his/her actions while being employed as an agent. The employee could be terminated because an injury or possible death occurred that was not what the agent was contracted to do. The employee could also be prosecuted because the wood pulp was stolen. Even though it was an effort to impress the company it is still punishable by law because the goods were stolen, not free.

The Topic Of Advertising And How It Affects Young Children

This research argument paper presents findings on the topic of advertising and how it affects young children. Advertising of all types, including television commercials are large part of everyday life. Through commercials and other advertising, agencies and companies introduce their product or services to people of all ages, including young children. Many people do not realize these advertisements truly have a profound effect on the development of young children. Advertisers understand that reaching children through these advertisements will increase their profits dramatically and do so without regard to the well-being of the child. The effects of advertisements, such as magazines and billboards, online advertisements and television†¦show more content†¦Advertisements may be in the form of a television commercial, a printed ad in a magazine, signs and billboards or commercials on television and advertisements on the internet. Advertisements are seen in the home; in stor es and even in the schools and do not always promote the best of things. Many online websites have increased advertising directed at children. Print advertisements, online advertisements and television commercials can have an adverse effect on children’s behavior and development through the exposure to negative options, as well as children having the need to possess material things they see in the advertisements. Children are negatively affected by advertisements because of the inability to understand the reason and the inclusion of violence and unhealthy food options. Children’s Understanding of Advertisements Advertisements and commercials are geared towards children now more than ever and the promoters of the products express exactly what the children want to hear. Although young children do not understand the meaning of commercials and advertising, these advertisements are very persuasive and encourage children to seek out the product, whether good or bad, that is being advertised. Young children are unable to differentiate information that is portrayed to them that may be biased, like information in a commercial on